Four of the five pools are read live from chain each time you search. Given an address, the accounts that could hold money for it are derivable, so there is nothing cached and nothing to go stale:
| Pool | Account |
|---|---|
| Trading cashback (curve) | PDA["user_volume_accumulator", you] on the pump program |
| Trading cashback (AMM) | PDA["user_volume_accumulator", you] on the AMM program |
| Your creator fees (curve) | PDA["creator-vault", you] on the pump program |
| Your creator fees (AMM) | the WSOL account of PDA["creator_vault", you] on the AMM |
The fifth — whether a token named you as a fee recipient — cannot be derived from your address alone, because it depends on what launchers chose. That one comes from a full scan of all 779,752 fee-sharing configs, last run on 2026-10-16, rebuilt every week.
Every figure comes from a complete pass over the account set, not an extrapolation. Sampled estimates were wrong by 41% and 880% on two of these pools, in both cases because a handful of very large accounts carried the average. Full pass or no number.
Scripts and method: status.